大象传媒

鈥淭he truth takes long to spread, while the lies spread fast here.鈥�

This is the assessment of Malawian farmer and activist Anita Chitaya after finishing a cross-country tour of the United States, attempting to bring home the reality of climate change to American farmers. Her experience is chronicled in an award-winning new film from co-directors Zak Piper and Raj Patel: The Ants & the Grasshopper.

Patel is probably best known for his social justice activism and writings, including (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2021) co-authored with , and Stuffed and Starved: The Hidden Battle for the World Food System (Melville House, 2008). This is his first film, but he was quick to acknowledge the power dynamics inherent in filmmaking. He says he and his team did their best to decolonize the process, which is why they decided to forgo having a big Hollywood name narrate the film in favor of having Chitaya do the voiceover in her native Tumbuka language.

Patel first visited Chitaya鈥檚 village in the early 2000s, where the organization Soil, Food, and Healthy Communities was educating the community on climate issues. She learned that the severe drought she and her community were experiencing in Malawi (where they received an average of three days of rain per year) stemmed from the burning of fossil fuels in countries like the United States.

鈥淲hen Anita had first learned about climate change, her initial and instinctive response was, 鈥楧o you need me to come to America?鈥� because she couldn’t believe that we are being so cavalier about the planet, and are in such denial about the change that鈥檚 required,鈥� Patel says.

And so that鈥檚 just what Patel and Chitaya did. Over a decade, a team filmed Chitaya鈥檚 work in Malawi and also supported her on a trip across the U.S. to converse with leaders, farmers, activists, and others about the ways in which actions in the U.S. are affecting farmers across the globe.

鈥淎nita had a theory of change,鈥� Patel explains. 鈥淚f you go to someone鈥檚 doorstep with your problem, they cannot ignore you. And that works well in the political ecology of the village in which she lives. You go to someone鈥檚 house, and you talk things through, and you come to some sort of amicable resolution.鈥� This is demonstrated in the film as Chitaya gracefully facilitates conversations with members of her community to dismantle patriarchy one household at a time. She is curious, she cares, she listens, and she does not back down. And change follows.

That same theory of change proved less successful in the U.S. as the filmmakers struggled to get people in positions of power to even have a conversation with Chitaya. 鈥淚f the government won鈥檛 hear you, if the corporations don鈥檛 hear you, if the philanthropists do not return your calls or do not think that you deserve the dignity of response, then you can鈥檛 get that theory of change off the ground,鈥� Patel says.

Still, over the course of the film, Chitaya travels across the U.S., talking to folks about their experiences with growing food and supporting community ties. In the Midwest, she encountered farmers who had enough land and rain that they could continue to pretend that climate change was far off, fake, or even a political agenda. In other areas of the country, especially in communities of color, she encountered groups of people aware of the realities and inequities of climate change and working daily to try to overcome it. They embraced the intersectional nature of the issue and tried to tackle it as such.

鈥淎lthough the language of intersectionality is something that may feel fairly novel to us in the U.S., it is the lived experience of communities on the front lines of climate change and fighting hunger,鈥� Patel explains.

In shaping his approach to the film, Patel took his lead from the international peasant movement, La Via Campesina, which has for decades been saying that food sovereignty is about an end to all forms of violence against women. The film does not shy away from acknowledging the ways in which the issue of climate change is about more than just growing food.

鈥淭o craft a world that can support everybody is always intersectional,鈥� Patel says. 鈥淚t always involves class, it always involves race, it always involves gender.鈥�

So that鈥檚 what he and the rest of the team tried to show in the film鈥攖hat many different struggles are peripheral to climate that can and should be addressed simultaneously.

鈥淭his journey was one of understanding that there are many Americas, not just one,鈥� Patel says. And despite the setbacks, Chitaya continues on her quest to overcome climate change with inspiring resolve. It speaks to her amazing ability to connect with people.

鈥淎nything that Anita touches is magic,鈥� Patel says. 鈥淪he鈥檚 a force of nature. I mean she鈥檚 a teacher, she is a mother, she is an agent of God, she is a farmer, she is an educator, she is a kicker of asses, and a taker of names.鈥�

Still, changing hearts and minds is hard work.

鈥淢erely to be shown a picture of something is sometimes not sufficient,鈥� Patel says. Throwing information and facts at people rarely changes their minds. And showing American farmers just how difficult it is to grow a crop in Malawi isn鈥檛 enough. 鈥淵ou need the kinds of stories of change and of characters that you can believe in, who have gone through this sort of big transformation in order to show you that such a thing is possible鈥攊t is necessary and possible,鈥� Patel says.  

And that鈥檚 just what The Ants & the Grasshopper aims to do.

Patel, a decadeslong subscriber and contributing editor to 大象传媒 Magazine, knows who he wants to reach with the film. 鈥淭he kind of people that 大象传媒 readers give 大象传媒 to in the hopes that it鈥檒l change their mind鈥攖hose are the people we鈥檙e after,鈥� he says.

He suggests sitting down to watch the film with a friend and a cup of coffee to start what might be a difficult conversation.

鈥淚t鈥檚 that talk that accompanies the film that changes people and changes their work.鈥�