Abrams Counters Trump With a Compelling Vision for America
Why you can trust us
Former Georgia legislator Stacey Abrams delivered the Democratic Party response Tuesday night: 鈥淲ith a renewed commitment to social and economic justice, we will create a stronger America together.鈥澛犅�
What did we expect from the 2019 Trump State of the Union? This annual ritual of a president coming into The People鈥檚 House to deliver a national health check-up has become political theater. Presidents use the stage to make a case for their policies in the year to come. The script for many years has been a list of carefully market-tested proposals.
Tuesday night鈥檚 address was different. For one, this was Donald Trump, making what is probably his last best effort to save his border wall from legislative doom. He wasn鈥檛 going to pivot to centrism the way any other president might in order to set up a re-election run. He also wasn鈥檛 likely to stick to a script, even as he visibly struggled to read his speech from a teleprompter. This was an angry Trump, his sense of victimization unchanged despite two years in office.
The other difference was Stacey Abrams, the former Georgia legislator who nearly became the first Black woman governor in the nation鈥檚 history. Abrams, rather than a sitting member of Congress, was chosen to deliver the official Democratic response to Trump鈥檚 address.
This is significant in many ways, not least because the Democratic Party chose to elevate a fiery orator, a woman of color with legitimate reasons to be angry after what many believe was a stolen election, over a more moderate choice already setting up a presidential campaign.
On display were two opposing visions for America and, when it comes right down to it, the brands of the two parties.
Trump essentially revisited his 鈥淎merican carnage鈥� inaugural address, with his usual laundry list of bugaboos: the caravans, the smugglers, MS-13 gang members, China. That was coupled with the applause lines for his base (鈥淎merica will never be a socialist country鈥�), the suspect and sometimes outright false figures (contrary to his assertion, ), and the parade of military heroes, cops, and family members of those killed by immigrants. And, of course, the wall.
Afterward, there was Abrams, embodying a version of a 鈥淢ake America Better鈥� platform. She started with her life story growing up in a working-class family. She used language that was not about power and violence, but about compassion, service, and justice. She attacked Trump鈥檚 policies (鈥淭his administration chooses to cage children and tear families apart.鈥�) and delivered alternatives (鈥淎merica is made stronger by the presence of immigrants, not walls.鈥�)
The differences between the two visions couldn鈥檛 have been starker.
In a presidential election, brand matters. Ronald Reagan鈥檚 sunny optimism won out over Jimmy Carter鈥檚 dispirited realism. Barack Obama鈥檚 鈥淗ope and Change鈥� proved a stronger engine than John McCain鈥檚 鈥淪traight Talk Express.鈥� And Trump鈥檚 鈥淢ake America Great Again,鈥� despite its brashness, couldn鈥檛 be countered with Hillary Clinton鈥檚 exhaustive list of sturdy policy proposals. The mainstream punditocracy won鈥檛 again make the mistake that MAGA is empty of meaning as so many did in 2016. The red hat is not a value-neutral symbol. It鈥檚 come to stand for everything that is Trumpism, from racism to protectionism to anti-intellectualism.
Whether Stacey Abrams joins the ballooning Democratic field of presidential candidates is less relevant than this: Can a Democratic candidate create a compelling vision of what America might be? Medicare for all, taxes on the wealthy, a Green New Deal are all sensible and popular proposals. The question is what kind of a package they鈥檒l be presented in.
We鈥檝e already seen how Congress鈥� new freshman class is making its mark: More women and people of color than ever. Some of the newest members, including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, are making waves primarily by talking about radical policies that just a decade ago were outside the bounds of mainstream debate. The ground has shifted, and the Democratic Party looks as if it鈥檚 going with it.
That鈥檚 what鈥檚 going to be necessary to defeat Trumpism in 2020, what the late George H.W. Bush referred to as the 鈥渧ision thing.鈥� And what we鈥檙e seeing, and this includes the collision of visions on Tuesday night, is a turning point.
Emerging from the new class of Democrats is a repudiation not only of Trumpism but also the neoliberal economic system that was on display at the World Economic Forum in Davos a couple weeks ago. There鈥檚 also 聽growing recognition that we don鈥檛 want to go back to the way it was before鈥攖hat way led us to where we are now. The old regime is being defenestrated, and most Americans are perfectly fine with that.
Did Trump offer policy proposals? Sure. He proposed preventing people with pre-existing conditions from being denied coverage, as if he鈥檇 never heard of the Affordable Care Act. He promised to get even tougher on China, even as his policies have led us into an escalating trade war. There was even a kernel of truth to some of his remarks. Great nations indeed do not fight endless wars. But great nations also try to make the world a better and safer place.
The key contest in the struggle for control of the government is one of values. It supersedes any specific policy while at the same time informing all of them. Having a vision, a clear alternative to the prevailing nihilism, is something almost everyone can get behind. Abrams showed how to do that.
|
Chris Winters
is a senior editor at 大象传媒, where he specializes in covering democracy and the economy. Chris has been a journalist for more than 20 years, writing for newspapers and magazines in the Seattle area. He鈥檚 covered everything from city council meetings to natural disasters, local to national news, and won numerous awards for his work. He is based in Seattle, and speaks English and Hungarian.
|
Inspiration in Your Inbox
Sign up to receive email updates from 大象传媒
