大象传媒

Update 01/31/2017: After meeting with Vice President Pence today, the Acting Secretary of the Army Robert Speer reportedly has directed the Army Corps of Engineers to issue the easement needed to complete the Dakota Access pipeline. The Standing Rock Sioux answered with a statement: 鈥淭he Army Corps lacks statutory authority to simply stop the EIS and issue the easement.鈥�

On Wednesday, a federal government website and phone line designed to take public comments鈥攁s part of an Environmental Impact Statement process ordered for the Dakota Access pipeline鈥攕topped accepting comments, adding to speculation that the Trump administration was halting the process. But today the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said the public input period is open, and will be through Feb. 20.

鈥淚 ask again that you take the time to meet with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.鈥�

The public is instructed to mail, hand deliver, or email comments. (Send email to [email protected] with subject line 鈥淣OI Comments, Dakota Access Pipeline Crossing.鈥� Regular mail to Mr. Gib Owen, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, 108 Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310-0108.) 

An email from Timothy Vail, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Military Assistant to the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), said: 鈥淚 assure you, Mr. Owen continues to accept comments at the present time.鈥�

The surfaced in social media conversations a day after Trump signed an order trying to speed up construction of the Dakota Access and restart Keystone XL plans. 

On Dec. 4, then-Assistant Secretary Jo-Ellen Darcy stated that 鈥渢he consideration of alternative routes for the Dakota Access Pipeline Crossing would be best accomplished through an Environmental Impact Statement with full public input and analysis.鈥� The to begin that process was filed with the Federal Register on Jan. 18. Darcy was an Obama appointee and has not yet been replaced.

Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave Archambault, whose tribe has led the legal challenges to the pipeline鈥檚 route, on Wednesday: 鈥淭he law requires that changes in agency positions be backed by new circumstances or new evidence, not simply by the President鈥檚 whim. It makes it even more difficult when one considers the close personal ties you and your associates have had with Energy Transfer Partners and Sunoco.

鈥淵our memorandum issues these directives with the condition that these actions are carried out 鈥榯o the extent permitted by law.鈥� I would like to point out that the law now requires an Environmental Impact Statement. The USACE now lacks statutory authority to issue the easement because it has committed to the EIS process. Federal law, including the requirement of reasonable agency decision making, prevents that.鈥�

In requesting a 鈥渓eader to leader鈥� meeting with Trump, Archambault said: 鈥淭his disregard for tribal diplomatic relations and the potential for national repercussions is utterly alarming.鈥�

鈥淚 ask again that you take the time to meet with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. I have previously met with those who have worked in opposition to our interests and know from experience that there is much to be shared that would likely affect your decision making. But we must have the opportunity to speak, leader to leader.鈥�

---

 Here is the draft of his Jan. 25 letter.

Dear President Trump:

Congratulations on your inauguration. As the Chairman of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, I last wrote to you on December 21st to request an opportunity to meet with you regarding the Dakota Access pipeline. Unfortunately, this did not happen. Then this past Tuesday, January 23rd, you issued an executive memorandum that will have direct impacts on the lives of my tribal citizens, without any consultation whatsoever.

During your transition period, officials from your team met with tribal leaders from around the country, including some of my own tribal council. We were assured that the Trump administration was looking forward to working with Indian Country. Unfortunately, I think we may have gotten off on the wrong foot. In order to work together, we must be at the same table and hear both sides of the story.

Let me reiterate: Dozens of communities around the globe have acted to support Standing Rock. Several hundred tribal nations have stood by us. There has been a tremendous outpouring of people, farmers and ranchers, people in small towns and big cities, all supporting our efforts. This is not only a Native American movement, it is a movement of the working class and rural whose voices are often quieted at the expense of more powerful neighbors. Millions stand by us, and will continue to do so as we receive executive indication that infrastructure projects will be driven by corporate desire rather than American values.

Your Memorandum of January 24th instructs the Secretary of the Army to direct the Assistant Secretary for Civil Works and the US Army Corps of Engineers to review and expedite 鈥渞equests for approvals to construct and operate the DAPL,鈥� including easements. It also directs them to consider rescinding or modifying the Memo of December 4th, which calls for an Environmental Impact Statement and consideration of a reroute. There is more, but perhaps most astonishingly it calls for consideration of withdrawal of the Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS.

President Trump, the EIS is already underway. The comment period does not close until February 20th and the Department of the Army has already received tens of thousands of comments. This change in course is arbitrary and without justification; the law requires that changes in agency positions be backed by new circumstances or new evidence, not simply by the President鈥檚 whim. It makes it even more difficult when one considers the close personal ties you and your associates have had with Energy Transfer Partners and Sunoco.

Your memorandum issues these directives with the condition that these actions are carried out 鈥渢o the extent permitted by law.鈥� I would like to point out that the law now requires an Environmental Impact Statement. The USACE now lacks statutory authority to issue the easement because it has committed to the EIS process. Federal law, including the requirement of reasonable agency decision making, prevents that.

As we have stated previously, we are not opposed to energy independence, national security, job creation, or economic development. The problem with the Dakota Access pipeline is not that it involves development, but rather that it was deliberately and precariously placed without proper consultation with tribal governments. This memo takes further action to disregard tribal interests, and the impacts of yesterday鈥檚 memorandums are not limited to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. This disregard for tribal diplomatic relations and the potential for national repercussions is utterly alarming.

I ask again that you take the time to meet with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. I have previously met with those who have worked in opposition to our interests and know from experience that there is much to be shared that would likely affect your decision making. But we must have the opportunity to speak, leader to leader.

Sincerely,

David Archambault, II

Updated 01/26/2017: This article was updated to reflect comments from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.